Digital book burning
Microsoft announced today that it would end Live Search Books, just eighteen months after the program was officially launched. Live Search Books, similar to Google Book Search, collaborated with publishers and libraries to make book content searchable and viewable online. However Live Search Books differed in that it included books currently in copyright only if granted permission by the publisher. Google Book Search digitizes books from libraries irrespective of their copyright status, the subject of an ongoing lawsuit.
The announcement from Microsoft held few clues as to why they were pulling the plug. Perhaps the revenue generated by book content didn't fit in with strategic changes that followed the collapse of talks with Yahoo. The announcement said in part: "This past Wednesday we announced our strategy to focus on verticals with high commercial intent, such as travel, and offer users cash back on their purchases from our advertisers." It's difficult to see the majority of books published, much less the books that we produce, fitting into "verticals with high commercial intent."
The University of Chicago Press supported the Live Search Books program by providing more than a thousand books to Microsoft in digital form for inclusion in the program.
It's worth noting that even after more than five years of development and digitization, Google Book Search is still classified as a beta project. Making book content available on the web is, now more than ever, just a work in progress.
Comments
In a sense I can understand why this is a problem, as it does have the potential to create a loss in revenue for book-sellers, as well as making it too easy for unscrupulous people to just copy and paste information from these sources for monetary gain, such as putting it on an adsense website. Copyright infringement is a very serious problem on the Internet; and it doesn't look like it is going to go away.
Posted by: zanyanna
|
May 27, 2008 10:44 AM
Its quite disconcerting and confusing that Google (an organisation rife with academics, phd-ers and postgrads) is the one flouting copyright principles which most academics adhere by religiously, while the more business orientated Microsoft abides by them. It's 75 years from the time of publication before copyright is released and the medium its distributed in shouldn't matter.
Which reminds me, Google Books might want to take a peek at the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) sometime soon as well.
Posted by: Chris Boswell
|
March 12, 2009 06:55 AM
Digitalization of all written heritage is good, just how to handle that all, when it's done...
Posted by: bellick
|
March 28, 2009 12:09 PM