From nameless Gitmo detainees to warrantless wiretaps, the abuse of executive power by successive presidents continues to make headlines. Even NPR’s This American Life entered the fray with a piece that aired last weekend about the 1953 U.S. Supreme Court case that created a “state secret privilege” permitting the executive branch to derail normal judicial procedures for cases it claimed would disclose national security secrets. The TAL story reveals that the original 1953 case, in fact, contained no state secrets at all—calling into question not only the government’s motives for moving to dismiss that trial, but undermining the legal basis for the string of cases shut down since—up through the Bush administrations and, unfortunately, the current administration as well.
If this were not enough to concern the ordinary citizen, Peter M. Shane, professor of law at Ohio State University and author of the new book, Madison’s Nightmare: How Executive Power Threatens American Democracy argues in a recent article for George Mason University’s History News Network that the most systematic White House power grab has garnered much less publicity.
Over the past thirty years, Shane argues, the White House has taken increasing control over “domestic rulemaking activity by administrative agencies”—agencies . . .















Chicago’s aspirations to become a hub for independent publishing
Chicago Public Radio aired a piece this morning on the city’s recent efforts to be come a hub for independent publishers. According to CPR City Room contributor Lynette Kalsnes Chicago’s Department of Cultural Affairs has hired Danielle Chapman, former editor of Poetry magazine, to spearhead an effort to “galvanize the industry” by creating more public awareness of the many small local publishers that dot the Chicago landscape, and by fostering ties in the currently fragmented Chicago publishing industry. Contributing to the conversation is University of Chicago Press director Garrett Kiely. Formerly President of Palgrave Macmillan in New York, Kiely explains that the publishing industry in Chicago lacks the kind of close interaction amongst members of the publishing community in the Big Apple, but working with a small group of publishers currently advising Chapman, he sees that changing.
According to Kalsnes “the cultural affairs department is hosting meet-and-greets for local publishers and public events on the future of publishing and also has created a literary and publishing section of the Chicago Artists Resource web site. “But,” Kalsnes says, “neither Kiely — nor anyone else I talked to — wants Chicago to become another New York.” Kalsnes continues: “the industry . . .
Read more »