Main

November 14, 2007

Commentary: Alan Jamieson

jacket image
Faith and Sword author Alan Jamieson incisively argues in his November 14th Globe and Mail editorial that the U. S. military's "surge" strategy in Iraq is not working as well as the recent drop in casualties may suggest. In "Timeout for the Grim Reaper?", Jamieson contends that the various religious and political factions in Iraq are still very much alive and well, and rather than being defeated, they may be only pausing before resuming their fight against the American occupying forces:

Continue reading "Commentary: Alan Jamieson" »

October 25, 2007

Commentary: Hannah Velten's Cow

Hannah Velten wrote an engaging editorial for the British publication Farmer's Weekly about the history of cows and cattle. An excerpt:


But it is only relatively recently that we have started to view the cow as an almost alien being. In our urban, media-led country, cows are either seen as cutesy animals (especially calves) or are seen in a negative light as environment killers (think "Cow farts destroy ozone"), disease-bearing nightmares (think "Mad Cows") or the pitiable wreckage of intensive farming (think "Poor Cows"). . . .

So it seems sad to think that the animal that played such a huge role in shaping civilisations has been reduced to a commercial milking machine, a sperm donor, a walking larder and a provider of leather. I'm hoping that Cow will reintroduce the public (and also farmers) to this remarkable animal, by recognising what cattle have contributed to our culture, and also to instill some respect for what cattle produce for us—they work so hard; I am just trying to repay my debt of gratitude.

Read the full editorial
Check out the author's blog
Learn more about Cow

October 22, 2007

Commentary: Danny Postel

jacket image
Danny Postel wrote a hard-hitting editorial this weekend on the blog of fellow Prickly Paradigm author Rick Perlstein: In "Terrorism Awareness Indeed," he discusses the barely acknowledged political partnership between American neoconservatives and the Mujahedeen-e Khalq or MEK, an extremist Iranian political party that has been designated a terrorist organization by the State Department. Postel incisively punctures a hole in American Right's denunciations of "Islamo-fascism", revealing that right-wing conservatives actually are supporting what they claim to fight against:


Here you have virtually everything the Right claims to oppose all rolled into one: Islamism, Marxism, terrorism, and Saddam. Naturally, then, neoconservatives would utterly deplore the MEK and everything it stands for, right? The MEK would in fact make an ideal target for Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week and Terrorism Awareness efforts, no?

Well, no. At least one of the carnival's acts, it turns out, is rather fond of the Islamo-Stalinist-terrorist cult group, and has repeatedly argued for the removal of the MEK from the State Department's list of terrorist groups and indeed urged the U.S. government to embrace it. . . .

But the fact that several prominent American conservatives have cozied up to an Islamist-Stalinist cult that was on Saddam's payroll and the State Department considers a terrorist organization—this raises serious questions (to put it mildly) about the Right's bedfellows and the calculus that determines them.


Read Danny Postel's full article

Learn more about Danny Postel's Reading Legitimation Crisis in Tehran

October 15, 2007

A Q&A with New York Calling co-editor Brian Berger

jacket image
As the editors and contributors of New York Calling tour New York this fall, Brian Berger answers a few questions for us about the book:

What was your goal in putting together this anthology?

To sometimes outline, sometimes detail the full range of history and culture in New York City from 1977 or so to the present. It could not, of course, be fully done, but we began with the idea it was crucial to try. That means that New York City is a given number of boroughs and untold numbers of ethnicities, cultures, and subcultures, all of which are potentially of interest.

Continue reading "A Q&A with New York Calling co-editor Brian Berger" »

August 20, 2007

Author Commentary: Alan G. Jamieson

jacket image

In a Globe and Mail op-ed published on Wednesday, August 15, Alan Jamieson considers the telling parallels between the British occupation of Egypt from 1882 to 1919 and the now four-year U.S. occupation of Iraq. In particular, he considers when and how the U.S. will finally withdraw from Iraq. He notes:

Thus, the Americans probably face stronger pressure to leave Iraq than was exerted on the British in Egypt, but they may still feel they have compelling reasons to stay, whatever the political debate at home.

Like the British in Egypt, the Americans may promise year after year to leave Iraq, yet still hang on. Whether they will match the British record of a "temporary" occupation that lasted for three-quarters of a century is another matter.

Read Jamieson's op-ed

Learn more about Alan Jamieson's Faith and Sword

July 26, 2006

Continuing the Christian-Muslim Conflict?: Israel, Iran and Lebanon by Alan G. Jamieson

1861892721.jpeg

Read another essay by Jamieson on Afghanistan in The Edmonton Journal

The current clash between Israel and Hizbollah in Lebanon brings more warfare to an area that has seen the clash of armies since ancient times. Is this a new stage in a conflict that has its roots in the modern post-1945 period or just a continuation of a centuries-old struggle? It may seem odd to characterize warfare between a Jewish state and a terrorist group drawn from the Shia Muslim population of Lebanon as a continuation of the Christian-Muslim conflict which began in the seventh century CE, yet this clash has discernible roots in that age-old struggle. This essay will examine the elements of historical continuity between the past and today, as well as important new features in the current conflict.

At the start of the twentieth century, the world's greatest Muslim power, the Ottoman empire, was struggling to resist the attacks upon it by the Christian powers of Europe. This conflict still had a definite religious aspect. During the 1890s the Christian powers had threatened to intervene when Christian Armenians were massacred in the empire. For a thousand years the Muslims had generally been dominant in the Christian-Muslim conflict, but from the seventeenth century onwards, the Christian powers of Europe had become ever stronger. They achieved their final victory in the First World War. The Ottoman Empire was defeated and broken up. By the early 1920s there were only a handful of Muslim states in the world which were not part of one of the European empires.

Continue reading "Continuing the Christian-Muslim Conflict?: Israel, Iran and Lebanon by Alan G. Jamieson" »

March 01, 2006

We're All Normal and We Want Our Freedom

rights.jpg

The McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum recently conducted a survey that shows a sampling of the adult population in the United States finds it easier to recall the five main characters from The Simpsons than to name the five freedoms protected by the First Amendment. Approximately one in five adults could name all five Simpsons. Only one in one thousand could name all five freedoms.

Here is the apparently obscure, but beloved amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Visit the McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum's Site

Visit the National Archives